mikarrhea banner
mika·cooper·her·blog
randomneuronfiringalienatedmajestysexgendersystemlamephilosophyfilmflamliterarypontificatingnowthisanecdotagepolitixdoggerelbloggeralijustgoberSERK
mikarrhea

blog-O-rama

>  blogdex
MIT media lab
>  boing boing
Cory Doctorow & friends
>  meme list
christian crumlish
>  snarkout
steve

e-personae

>  superette
Ann&Dabney
>  ByTheCathedral
Anonymous
>  boynton
Miss “Boynton”
>  Chocolate and Vodka
Suw Charman
>  margaret cho
nochorious
>  bloggedy blog blog
Katie Degentesh
>  Snozberry
Chris Horn
>  the redhead
wendy koslow
>  America Hates Us
Lillet & Trey
>  a girlie cul-de-sac
Ashlee McClelland
>  Making Light
theresa nielsen hayden
>  the fun hut
Fey Parrill
>  Free Love Freeway
Cynthia Rockwell
>  867-5309 jenny
jennifer roehm
>  Fists Unfurled
Sara Seinberg
>  michelle*
michelle thompson

logoblogs

>  Ivy is here
Ivy Alvarez
>  michael bérubé
Michael Bérubé
>  cup of chicha
Nathalie Chicha
>  Galley Cat
Nathalie Chicha
>  superdeluxe good poems
Chickee Chickston
>  eeksypeeksy
Malcolm Davidson
>  equanimity
Jordan Davis
>  pseudopodium
Ray Davis
>  transdada
Kari Edwards
>  Third Factory
Steve Evans
>  process documents
Ryan Fitzpatrick
>  overlap
Drew Gardner
>  ululate
Nada Gordon
>  old hag
Ms. Hag
>  this is all your fault
Christine Hamm
>  god of the machine
Aaron Haspel
>  Lisablog
Lisa Jarnot
>  The Jim Behrle Show
Jim Behrle
>  tykes on poetry
Jack Kimball
>  we write to taste life twice
Crystal King
>  lime tree
Kasey Silem Mohammed
>  Ruminate
Chris Lott
>  bemsha swing
Jonathan Mayhew
>  porthole redux
Catherine Meng
>  poop chute
Brooke Nelson
>  Maud Newton
Maud Newton
>  gila monster
Aimee Nezhukumatathil
>  mappemunde
Tim Peterson
>  fait accompli
Nick Piombino
>  caveat lector
Dorothea Salo
>  mike snider's formal blog & sonnetarium
Mike Snider
>  free space comix II
Brian K. Stephans
>  elsewhere
Gary Sullivan
>  the chatelaine's poetics
Eileen Tabios
>  about last night
Terry Teachout
>  CARVE
Aaron Tieger
>  Totebaggery
Lillet & Trey
>  okir
Jean Vengua
>  a fool in the forest
George M. Wallace
>  the ingredient
Alli Warren
>  william watkin's blog
William Watkin
>  stick poet super hero
Michael Wells
>  the well-nourished moon
Stephanie Young

politext

>  Agenda Bender
Agenda Bender
>  Eschaton
Atrios
>  Bad Attitudes
Jerry Doolittle
>  Empires Fall
Steve Barnes
>  Mystery Pollster
Mark Blumenthal
>  farai chideya
a former student
>  wonkette
ana marie cox
>  Brilliant at Breakfast
Jill Cozzi
>  crooked timber
philosocionomists
>  feministing
some ladies
>  filchyboy
christopher filkins
>  discourse.net
michael froomkin
>  talking points memo
josh marshall
>  the intersection
chris mooney
>  opinions you should have
tom burka
>  cousin blogorrhoea
Rob Schaap
>  the daily howler
bob sommerby
>  xx
some other ladies

sexual blogging

>  Susie Bright's Journal
Susie Bright
>  daze reader
evan daze
>  eros blog
bacchus & aphrodite
>  sex and depression
franny
>  edifying spectacle / pansexual sodomite
richard evans lee
>  Pillowbook
Wegglywoo



2008-09-19 00:15

I totally want to bathe and anoint in oil the feet of James Robertson, U.S. District Court Judge for the District of the District of Columbia (I don’t see how you can logically avoid using the District twice in that phrase, even though I mostly see it used only once in legal citations [wrongly, in my view, unless you write the District of Columbia District, in which case you’re still stuck with using District twice]).

Yesterday, Friday, Robertson decided—displaying reasoning of such extraordinary clarity (please, read the decision!) it’s frankly mind-boggling (though, perhaps, understandable coming from someone inured to confronting daily the confounding Two- District -Usage Dilemma)—that a transgendered woman, Diane Schroer, who had applied for, been enthusiastically offered, and accepted a plum job with the Library of Congress while yet presenting as male under the name David Schroer, subsequently suffered prima facie unlawful Title VII discrimination “because of sex” when, before actually embarking on the new duties, Schroer revealed to her new boss, Charlotte Preece, that she was transgendered and in transition and would be embarking on the new duties presenting as a woman, whereupon the job offer was instantly withdrawn and the position handed over to a significantly less-qualified applicant.

How many American judges would instead have sneered distastefully over the facts of this case and reflexively advanced the tried-and-true Specious-Narrow-Argument Counter-Attack: e.g., that Title VII (which prohibits discrimination “because of sex”) says nothing about, and therefore does not prohibit discrimination against, transsexuals? It’s a proven technique. Just look at the way “Whizzer” White, Burger, et al. reflexively advanced their own version of the SNACA, smugly announcing in Bowers v. Hardwick that the Constitution (even after the Supreme Court’s prolonged fleshing out of citizens’ right to privacy, specifically with respect to questions of sexual intimacy, in the line of decisions subsequent to Griswold v. Connecticut) does not recognize “a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy” and that it is “facetious” to assert that such a right is “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”

The same sort of self-righteous SNACA, of course, could be asserted against nose-picking, earwax-excavating, and crotch-scratching. Is the right to scratch one’s crotch “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”? If you say yes, it sure seems as though you’ve made yourself into a huge figure of fun. If you say no, then you’ve surrendered to the expanding Executive branch yet one more human action for surveillance and criminal prosecution that the Founding Fathers, if they thought about such things at all, surely imagined would never, ever be a subject of Federal legal sanctions.

Robertson’s heroic purity, his intellectual nobility, comes from his pointing out, simply and obviously, like the child ostensively demonstrating the Emperor’s nudity, that the plaintiff was discriminated against, plainly and flagrantly, because of sex:

The evidence establishes that the Library was
enthusiastic about hiring David Schroer -– until she disclosed
her transsexuality. The Library revoked the offer when it
learned that a man named David intended to become, legally,
culturally, and physically, a woman named Diane. This was
discrimination “because of . . . sex.”

Yes! Thank you for seeing and pronouncing the irrefutable obvious, James Robertson! You deserve some sort of plaque mounted somewhere, maybe in the Library of Congress, maybe mounted and polished daily for the next 20 years by the vicious and indefensible Charlotte Preece, who after enthusiastically supporting and eagerly hiring her singlehandedly skippered the attempt to scupper Diane Schroer’s employment upon discovering her transsexuality.


  ·  


* * *

  1. Thank you for writing such a wonderful article!


    http://essaysale.net/    Apr 16, 05:13 AM    #
  2. Impressive contents and information. It’s really a great work for the author to share their useful thoughts and ideas to other. Keep up the good work.-


    www.essaymama.com    May 18, 08:22 AM    #
name
email
http://
Message
  Textile Help

  ·  

Blogarama - The Blog Directory Listed on BlogShares